Account of the burns and rafay case

Big tactic to extract the confessions, a practice that is illegal in the United States, but was legal at the time in Canada. After the investigation was complete, Burns and Rafay claimed their confessions were false, highly manipulated, and that jurors were biased by the media coverage of the crime. Nonetheless, plans were made to extradite Burns and Rafay. However, the Minister of Justice did not seek assurances in the case.

Account of the burns and rafay case

The press release claims that the documentary is unfair and inaccurate without pointing to any specific instances of inaccuracy or unfairness.

The release represents yet another attempt to justify the wrongful convictions in the absence of forensic evidence.

The Latest

At the end of the document the prosecutor states: The episode recounts no forensic evidence against Burns and Rafay because there was none. Had there been forensic evidence implicating them in this crime, no innocence project would have taken up this case.

This statement is in the eye of the beholder since the program has no outside narrative.

Account of the burns and rafay case

Police Detective Bob Thompson and James Konat, the prosecutor, are given more time on screen than anyone else.

The jury, which heard all of the evidence during a six-month trial, rejected this defense and convicted Burns and Rafay. That they were convicted is true. That the jury heard all the evidence is demonstrably false. They punish these unfaithful persons by bombing, stabbing and murdering.

The reason given, that a jury is qualified to decide who is lying and who is telling the truth, is specious. In fact, any cursory glance at scientific knowledge in this area will show that the average person is not qualified to do anything of the sort.

An FBI authority on sting operations, Michael Levine, was also denied witness status at the trial on the ground that he was not an expert. The RCMP and the prosecutors are the ones guilty of selectivity. Most of the initial conversations between Burns and the undercover officers were not recorded.

Sections of the tapes that do not support the convictions and that jurors never saw have been destroyed or disposed of. Why did Burns continue to seek out the mobsters and engage in petty criminal acts at their behest? Every time he committed an illegal act, he was given money.

That is why he sought them out. One of the purposes of the trial was to prejudice the jury by making Burns appear to be a criminal when, in reality, he is no different than the rest of us. The decision was made by elected—not independent—judges.

The only knowable lie is the RCMP mobsters lying about who they really were. Finally, the issue of Jimmy Miyoshi must be addressed. The reason that Miyoshi stated that he knew of the murders being planned beforehand is seriously in doubt because the transcripts show him resisting both the RCMP mobsters and, later, the police who pressured him unrelentingly to make incriminating statements against his friends.

What we have in our possession is the entire interrogation of Miyoshi after Burns and Rafay were arrested in This time he was talking to people he knew to be the police. What is also beyond doubt, and what the Netflix series points out, is that after Miyoshi returned to Japan, he was threatened by the loss of his job by his Japanese employer if he did not testify against his friends.

His testimony, therefore, was coerced, because the absence of forensic evidence and the fear that the so-called confessions garnered from an illegal sting operation would be thrown out of court made the case against Burns and Rafay paper thin.‘The Confession Tapes’ Re-Opens the Triple-Murder Case of Sebastian Burns and Atif Rafay King County prosecutor Dan Satterberg says the show is bunk.

The creators disagree. Fukuoka | Japan Fukuoka | Japan. Acquire account of the burns and rafay case knowledge, it enables its professor to distinguish right from wrong; it lights the way to complex analysis homework help heaven.

Was the blood in the "footprint. SIX REASONS WHY WE BELIEVE THAT SEBASTIAN BURNS AND ATIF RAFAY ARE INNOCENT. REASON ONE: No hard or scientifically gathered evidence ties them to the crime. A bludgeoning is an extremely bloody way to kill. It goes, almost without saying, that for one to bludgeon three different people to death and leave no trace of blood in the scalp or anywhere else on his face is unlikely.

Three innocence projects have now taken up the case of West Vancouver men Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns, who in were convicted of the slayings of Rafay's parents and sister in their. Maher Arar (Arabic: ماهر عرار ‎) (born ) is a telecommunications engineer with dual Syrian and Canadian citizenship who has resided in Canada since Arar's story is frequently referred to as "extraordinary rendition" but the US government insisted it was a case of was detained during a layover at John F.

Kennedy International Airport in September on his.

United States v. Burns by Elwood Tran on Prezi